linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix ARM32 platforms compile issue introduced by fw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hkGfqzHwmhBKqwhcEchncM6kEgx_TJgJGgjiR5yMZkLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:14:41 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Cc:     linus.walleij@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
        robert.moore@...el.com, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, guohanjun@...wei.com, arnd@...db.de,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        cfsworks@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi: Fix ARM32 platforms compile issue introduced by
 fw_table changes

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:19 PM Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Linus reported that:
> After commit a103f46633fd the kernel stopped compiling for
> several ARM32 platforms that I am building with a bare metal
> compiler. Bare metal compilers (arm-none-eabi-) don't
> define __linux__.
>
> This is because the header <acpi/platform/acenv.h> is now
> in the include path for <linux/irq.h>:
>
>   CC      arch/arm/kernel/irq.o
>   CC      kernel/sysctl.o
>   CC      crypto/api.o
> In file included from ../include/acpi/acpi.h:22,
>                  from ../include/linux/fw_table.h:29,
>                  from ../include/linux/acpi.h:18,
>                  from ../include/linux/irqchip.h:14,
>                  from ../arch/arm/kernel/irq.c:25:
> ../include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:218:2: error: #error Unknown target environment
>   218 | #error Unknown target environment
>       |  ^~~~~
>
> The issue is caused by the introducing of splitting out the ACPI code to
> support the new generic fw_table code.
>
> Rafael suggested [1] moving the fw_table.h include in linux/acpi.h to below
> the linux/mutex.h. Remove the two includes in fw_table.h. Add include of
> linux/acpi.h in fw_table.c before the fw_table.h include.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0idWdJq3JSqQWLG5q+b+b=zkEdWR55rGYEoxh7R6N8kFQ@mail.gmail.com/
> Fixes: a103f46633fd ("acpi: Move common tables helper functions to common lib")
> Reported-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Remove linux/acpi.h include as well in fw_table.h. (Sam)
> ---
>  include/linux/acpi.h     |   22 +++++++++++-----------
>  include/linux/fw_table.h |    3 ---
>  lib/fw_table.c           |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 54189e0e5f41..4db54e928b36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/uuid.h>
> -#include <linux/fw_table.h>
>
>  struct irq_domain;
>  struct irq_domain_ops;
> @@ -25,22 +24,13 @@ struct irq_domain_ops;
>  #endif
>  #include <acpi/acpi.h>
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_TABLE_LIB
> -#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x) EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(x, ACPI)
> -#define __init_or_acpilib
> -#define __initdata_or_acpilib
> -#else
> -#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x)
> -#define __init_or_acpilib __init
> -#define __initdata_or_acpilib __initdata
> -#endif
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/dynamic_debug.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/fw_table.h>
>
>  #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
>  #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
> @@ -48,6 +38,16 @@ struct irq_domain_ops;
>  #include <acpi/acpi_io.h>
>  #include <asm/acpi.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_TABLE_LIB
> +#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x) EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(x, ACPI)
> +#define __init_or_acpilib
> +#define __initdata_or_acpilib
> +#else
> +#define EXPORT_SYMBOL_ACPI_LIB(x)
> +#define __init_or_acpilib __init
> +#define __initdata_or_acpilib __initdata
> +#endif
> +
>  static inline acpi_handle acpi_device_handle(struct acpi_device *adev)
>  {
>         return adev ? adev->handle : NULL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/fw_table.h b/include/linux/fw_table.h
> index ff8fa58d5818..ca49947f0a77 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fw_table.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fw_table.h
> @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ struct acpi_subtable_proc {
>         int count;
>  };
>
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
> -#include <acpi/acpi.h>
> -
>  union acpi_subtable_headers {
>         struct acpi_subtable_header common;
>         struct acpi_hmat_structure hmat;
> diff --git a/lib/fw_table.c b/lib/fw_table.c
> index b51f30a28e47..c4831f3378be 100644
> --- a/lib/fw_table.c
> +++ b/lib/fw_table.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>   *  Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corp.
>   */
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/fw_table.h>

Because fw_table.h is included via acpi.h, do you still need to
include it directly here?

>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
>
>