linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v6 1/2] ACPI: thermal: Add Thermal fast Sampling Period (

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2023 14:34:24 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        lenb@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com,
        sudeep.holla@....com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, treding@...dia.com,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com,
        ksitaraman@...dia.com, srikars@...dia.com, jbrasen@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 1/2] ACPI: thermal: Add Thermal fast Sampling Period
 (_TFP) support

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:55 PM Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/11/23 01:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 7:34 PM Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@...dia.com>
> >>
> >> Add support of "Thermal fast Sampling Period (_TFP)" for Passive cooling.
> >> As per [1], _TFP overrides the "Thermal Sampling Period (_TSP)" if both
> >> are present in a Thermal zone.
> >>
> >> [1] ACPI Specification 6.4 - section 11.4.17. _TFP (Thermal fast Sampling
> >>      Period)"
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@...dia.com>
> >> Co-developed-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 12 +++++++++---
> >>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> >> index f74d81abdbfc..3b75eb2260d7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/thermal.c
> >> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ struct acpi_thermal_passive {
> >>          struct acpi_thermal_trip trip;
> >>          unsigned long tc1;
> >>          unsigned long tc2;
> >> -       unsigned long tsp;
> >> +       unsigned long delay;
> >>   };
> >>
> >>   struct acpi_thermal_active {
> >> @@ -404,11 +404,17 @@ static bool passive_trip_params_init(struct acpi_thermal *tz)
> >>
> >>          tz->trips.passive.tc2 = tmp;
> >>
> >> +       status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle, "_TFP", NULL, &tmp);
> >> +       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> >> +               tz->trips.passive.delay = tmp;
> >> +               return true;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >>          status = acpi_evaluate_integer(tz->device->handle, "_TSP", NULL, &tmp);
> >>          if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> >>                  return false;
> >>
> >> -       tz->trips.passive.tsp = tmp;
> >> +       tz->trips.passive.delay = tmp * 100;
> >>
> >>          return true;
> >>   }
> >> @@ -904,7 +910,7 @@ static int acpi_thermal_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> >>
> >>          acpi_trip = &tz->trips.passive.trip;
> >>          if (acpi_thermal_trip_valid(acpi_trip)) {
> >> -               passive_delay = tz->trips.passive.tsp * 100;
> >> +               passive_delay = tz->trips.passive.delay;
> >>
> >>                  trip->type = THERMAL_TRIP_PASSIVE;
> >>                  trip->temperature = acpi_thermal_temp(tz, acpi_trip->temp_dk);
> >> --
> >
> > So does the second patch in the series really depend on this one?
> >
> > If not, I can apply it I think.
>
> Yes, this patch can be applied independently. Thank you!

OK, applied as 6.8 material (with some changelog edits), thanks!