[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpoTWoSYjyZL7ARQiAeWabcXymy6f-tAzPM3YO=C_GOOZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:06:48 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Cc: Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/bridge: it66121: Allow link this driver as a lib
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 17:41, Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2023/11/23 16:08, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> The semantics of DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR flag are implement-defined,
> > No, they are not. Semantics are pretty simple: do not create the
> > drm_connector instance. Pass the flag to the next bridge in the chain.
>
>
> Then, my problem is that do we allow create a drm_connector instance in drm bridge
> driver nowadays?
Yes, if there is no DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR. But that's deprecated IMO.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists