linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/bridge: it66121: Allow link this driver as a lib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA8EJpoTWoSYjyZL7ARQiAeWabcXymy6f-tAzPM3YO=C_GOOZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:06:48 +0200
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev>
Cc:     Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@...ngson.cn>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/bridge: it66121: Allow link this driver as a lib

On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 17:41, Sui Jingfeng <sui.jingfeng@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2023/11/23 16:08, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >> The semantics of DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR flag are implement-defined,
> > No, they are not. Semantics are pretty simple: do not create the
> > drm_connector instance. Pass the flag to the next bridge in the chain.
>
>
> Then, my problem is that do we allow create a drm_connector instance in drm bridge
> driver nowadays?

Yes, if there is no DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR. But that's deprecated IMO.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry