[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b626455a-f7a4-2684-725c-c679dd75a515@omp.ru>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 19:37:27 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
<biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<mitsuhiro.kimura.kc@...esas.com>, <masaru.nagai.vx@...esas.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] net: ravb: Let IP specific receive function to
interrogate descriptors
On 11/20/23 11:45 AM, Claudiu wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>
> ravb_poll() initial code used to interrogate the first descriptor of the
> RX queue in case gptp is false to know if ravb_rx() should be called.
> This is done for non GPTP IPs. For GPTP IPs the driver PTP specific
It's called gPTP, AFAIK.
> information was used to know if receive function should be called. As
> every IP has it's own receive function that interrogates the RX descriptor
Its own.
> list in the same way the ravb_poll() was doing there is no need to double
> check this in ravb_poll(). Removing the code form ravb_poll() and
From ravb_poll().
> adjusting ravb_rx_gbeth() leads to a cleaner code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 18 ++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 588e3be692d3..0fc9810c5e78 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -771,12 +771,15 @@ static bool ravb_rx_gbeth(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q)
> int limit;
>
> entry = priv->cur_rx[q] % priv->num_rx_ring[q];
> + desc = &priv->gbeth_rx_ring[entry];
> + if (desc->die_dt == DT_FEMPTY)
> + return false;
> +
I don't understand what this buys us, the following *while* loop will
be skipped anyway, and the *for* loop as well, I think... And ravb_rx_rcar()
doesn't have that anyway...
> @@ -1279,25 +1282,16 @@ static int ravb_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> struct net_device *ndev = napi->dev;
> struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;
> - bool gptp = info->gptp || info->ccc_gac;
> - struct ravb_rx_desc *desc;
> unsigned long flags;
> int q = napi - priv->napi;
> int mask = BIT(q);
> int quota = budget;
> - unsigned int entry;
>
> - if (!gptp) {
> - entry = priv->cur_rx[q] % priv->num_rx_ring[q];
> - desc = &priv->gbeth_rx_ring[entry];
> - }
> /* Processing RX Descriptor Ring */
> /* Clear RX interrupt */
> ravb_write(ndev, ~(mask | RIS0_RESERVED), RIS0);
> - if (gptp || desc->die_dt != DT_FEMPTY) {
> - if (ravb_rx(ndev, "a, q))
> - goto out;
> - }
I don't really understand this code (despite I've AKCed it)...
Biju, could you explain this (well, you tried already but I don't
buy it anymore)?
> + if (ravb_rx(ndev, "a, q))
> + goto out;
This restores the behavior before:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=3d4e37df882b0f4f28b7223a42492650b71252c5
So does look correct. :-)
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists