linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the workqueues tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZV-YnVfdeU9NJWJw@slm.duckdns.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:23:25 -1000
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cgroup tree with the workqueues
 tree

Hello, Stephen.

On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 12:26:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Sorry about that. I resolved that in cgroup/for-6.8 yesterday but forgot
push it out. It's the same resolution and published through cgroup/for-next
now.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun