linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] nvme link failure fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dd7290ed-800f-4523-864d-45b5c2dc93cf@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 13:04:56 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] nvme link failure fixes

On 11/22/23 11:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2023, at 02:42, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/22/23 3:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>
>>> There are still a couple of link failures that I tried to address
>>> with a previous patch. I've split up the missing bits into smaller
>>> patches and tried to explain the bugs in more detail.
>>>
>>> With these applied, randconfig builds work again. Please either
>>> merge them or treat them as bug reports and find a different fix,
>>> I won't do another version.
>>
>> Applied, but had to hand-apply hunk 9 of patch 3 due to a previous
>> attempt at this:
>>
>> commit 23441536b63677cb2ed9b1637d8ca70315e44bd0
>> Author: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
>> Date:   Tue Nov 14 14:18:21 2023 +0100
>>
>>     nvme-tcp: only evaluate 'tls' option if TLS is selected
> 
> Ok, thanks for merging my changes! The commit from Hannes
> is what I had in my v1 for this, and it was a correct fix
> as well, my patch 3/3 was just a more elaborate way to do
> the same thing that I did since Hannes did not like my
> version at first.
> 
> The 23441536b6 commit was not in linux-next yesterday, so
> it looks like our patches crossed paths on the same day.

yeah, it was just recently merged, which is probably why it wasn't there
yet and you didn't see it. Not a big deal, easy enough to resolve - just
wanted to make sure you knew about it. It should all be heading upstream
shortly, just sent out the pull.

-- 
Jens Axboe