[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZV+8z7zloE/gn/4p@ninjato>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:57:51 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] drivers/i2c/busses: Don't let i2c adapters declare
I2C_CLASS_SPD support if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON
> Series was created supported by Coccinelle and its splitpatch.
I don't know splitpatch. However, I don't understand its result. Why
isn't there one patch for all in drivers/i2c/busses? Also, the subject
prefix should be plain "i2c: <do x for all drivers>" or something.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists