lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:20:10 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
        will@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] Documentation: arm64: Document the PMU event
 counting threshold feature



On 11/21/23 03:01, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:26 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>> Add documentation for the new Perf event open parameters and
>> the threshold_max capability file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst
>> index 1f87b57c2332..36b8111a710d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst
>> @@ -164,3 +164,59 @@ and should be used to mask the upper bits as needed.
>>     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/user-events.c
>>  .. _tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c:
>>     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
>> +
>> +Event Counting Threshold
>> +==========================================
>> +
>> +Overview
>> +--------
>> +
>> +FEAT_PMUv3_TH (Armv8.8) permits a PMU counter to increment only on
>> +events whose count meets a specified threshold condition. For example if
>> +threshold_compare is set to 2 ('Greater than or equal'), and the
>> +threshold is set to 2, then the PMU counter will now only increment by
>> +when an event would have previously incremented the PMU counter by 2 or
>> +more on a single processor cycle.
>> +
>> +To increment by 1 after passing the threshold condition instead of the
>> +number of events on that cycle, add the 'threshold_count' option to the
>> +commandline.
>> +
>> +How-to
>> +------
>> +
>> +The threshold, threshold_compare and threshold_count values can be
>> +provided per event:
>> +
>> +.. code-block:: sh
>> +
>> +  perf stat -e stall_slot/threshold=2,threshold_compare=2/ \
>> +            -e dtlb_walk/threshold=10,threshold_compare=3,threshold_count/
> Can you please explain this a bit more?
> 
> I guess the first event counts stall_slot PMU if the event if it's
> greater than or equal to 2.  And as threshold_count is not set,
> it'd count the stall_slot as is.  E.g. it counts 3 when it sees 3.

Hence without 'threshold_count' being set, the other two config requests
will not have an effect, is that correct ?

> 
> OTOH, dtlb_walk will count 1 if it sees an event less than 10.
> Is my understanding correct?

'Equals' and 'Greater-than-or-equal' makes sense and are intuitive. Just
wondering what will happen for 'Not-equal' and 'Less-than' - when would
the counter count in such cases ?

  0: Not-equal
  1: Equals
  2: Greater-than-or-equal
  3: Less-than

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ