[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZV6oYmVYsyYizvgg@archie.me>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:18:26 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Chun Ng <chunn@...dia.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Ankita Garg <ankitag@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION]: mmap performance regression starting with k-6.1
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 08:03:19PM +0000, Chun Ng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I observed there is performance regression on system call mmap(..). I tried both vanilla kernels and Raspberry Pi kernels on a Raspberry Pi 4 box and the results are pretty consistent among them.
>
> Bisection showed that the regression starts from k-6.1, and the latest vanilla k-6.7 is still showing the same regression.
>
> The test program calls mmap/munmap for a 4K page with MAP_ANON and MAP_PRIVATE flags, and ftrace is used to measure the time spent on the do_mmap(..) call. Measured time of a sample run with different vanilla kernel versions are:
> k-5.10 and k-6.0: ~157us
> k-6.1: ~194us
> k-6.7: ~214us
> Results are pretty consistent across multiple runs with a small percentage variance. Ftrace shows that latency of mmap_region(...) has increased since k-6.1. An application that makes frequent mmap(..) calls the accumulated extra latency is very noticeable.
Did you mean that v6.0 doesn't have this regression?
Confused...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists