[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a881a1ca-8e10-4e07-ada5-7fef30c26470@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:39:56 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, steven.price@....com
Cc: boris.brezillon@...labora.com, robh@...nel.org,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Ignore core_mask for poweroff and sync
interrupts
On 23/11/2023 10:53, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Some SoCs may be equipped with a GPU containing two core groups
> and this is exactly the case of Samsung's Exynos 5422 featuring
> an ARM Mali-T628 MP6 GPU: the support for this GPU in Panfrost
> is partial, as this driver currently supports using only one
> core group and that's reflected on all parts of it, including
> the power on (and power off, previously to this patch) function.
>
> The issue with this is that even though executing the soft reset
> operation should power off all cores unconditionally, on at least
> one platform we're seeing a crash that seems to be happening due
> to an interrupt firing which may be because we are calling power
> transition only on the first core group, leaving the second one
> unchanged, or because ISR execution was pending before entering
> the panfrost_gpu_power_off() function and executed after powering
> off the GPU cores, or all of the above.
Does not apply - I tried next 20231117/21/22/23.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists