[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231123111820.GC1243364@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:18:20 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mfd: intel-lpss: Amend IRQ check
On Mon, 06 Nov 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> From: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>
>
> platform_get_irq() returns a negative error code to indicating an
> error. All the same does pci_alloc_irq_vectors() and pci_irq_vector().
> So in intel_lpss_probe() the erroneous IRQ should be better returned
> as is.
>
> The pci_alloc_irq_vectors() call and platform_get_irq() guarantee
> that IRQ won't be 0, hence drop that check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <nichen@...as.ac.cn>
> [andy: updated commit message]
I reworded it further.
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
> index 9591b354072a..4c9d0222751a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c
> @@ -378,9 +378,12 @@ int intel_lpss_probe(struct device *dev,
> struct intel_lpss *lpss;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!info || !info->mem || info->irq <= 0)
> + if (!info || !info->mem)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (info->irq < 0)
> + return info->irq;
> +
> lpss = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpss), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!lpss)
> return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists