[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <797fd54-3038-4ed3-fc1c-ce7279c78a8@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:39:35 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, rajvi.jingar@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 19/20] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add debug attribute
for Die C6 counter
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2023, David E. Box wrote:
>
> > Add a "die_c6_us_show" debugfs attribute. Reads the counter value using
> > Intel Platform Monitoring Technology (PMT) driver API. This counter is
> > useful for determining the idle residency of CPUs in the compute tile.
> > Also adds a missing forward declaration for punit_ep which was declared in
> > an earlier upstream commit but only used for the first time in this one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > V5 - Change comment for crystal error and return value
> >
> > V4 - no change
> >
> > V3 - Split previous PATCH V2 13. Separates implementation (this patch) from
> > platform specific use (next patch)
> >
> > V2 - Remove use of __func__
> > - Use HZ_PER_MHZ
> > - Fix missing newlines in printks
> >
> > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h | 4 ++
> > 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> > index 4a38d52558fd..fb2c84fba0ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.c
>
> > +static int pmc_core_die_c6_us_show(struct seq_file *s, void *unused)
> > +{
> > + struct pmc_dev *pmcdev = s->private;
> > + u64 die_c6_res, count;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!pmcdev->crystal_freq) {
> > + dev_warn_once(&pmcdev->pdev->dev, "Crystal frequency unavailable\n");
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > + }
>
> I actually started to wonder whether it would be better to just not show
> the file in this case (using .is_visible())? (I'm sorry I forgot to send
> the note about that earlier.)
Ah, sorry, this was actually a debugfs file, not a sysfs one (and that's
why I didn't end up noting it earlier).
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists