[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZV9W5AmmYhCFmN9e@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:43:00 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ignat@...udflare.com,
eric_devolder@...oo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390/Kconfig: drop select of KEXEC
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:36:52PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
> No proof is found to require that S390 architecture has to select
> KEXEC. At least from my testing at below, dropping select of KEXEC won't
> impact anything.
It does impact the outcome of defconfigs.
Namely, CONFIG_KEXEC is not set with this patch.
> ===testing 1===
> CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
> CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
> CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
> ===
>
> ===testing 2===
> CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
> CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
> CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y
> CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
> ===
Unfortunately, I do not quite realize what these testings were
and what is the difference between the two.
> So drop the select of KEXEC now.
I suggest dropping this patch. Once the previous two are upstream
we would remove 'select KEXEC' from Kconfig together with defconfig
updates.
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index 3bec98d20283..1aec2e692dca 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ config S390
> select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_IDLE
> select IOMMU_HELPER if PCI
> select IOMMU_SUPPORT if PCI
> - select KEXEC
> select MMU_GATHER_MERGE_VMAS
> select MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
> select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> --
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists