[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231123-edge-skinless-3ec70c2958c9@wendy>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 14:32:44 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
CC: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Yu-Chien Peter Lin <peterlin@...estech.com>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <heiko@...ech.de>, <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
<guoren@...nel.org>, <jszhang@...nel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <will@...nel.org>,
<anup@...infault.org>, <dminus@...estech.com>,
<dylan@...estech.com>, <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
<locus84@...estech.com>, <tim609@...estech.com>,
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<evan@...osinc.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] perf: RISC-V: Move T-Head PMU to CPU
feature alternative framework
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:43:09PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> PMU support is not required to boot, and it didn't really work correctly anyway
> until OpenSBI commit c9a296d0edc9 ("platform: generic: allwinner: fix OF process
> for T-HEAD c9xx pmu"), which is still not in any released OpenSBI version.
>
> So I am fine with requiring a devicetree update for continued PMU support.
Okay, would be nice to get an ack on the relevant parts of the most recent
iteration of the series confirming this :)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists