[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZV9wt4+F/soWxVhR@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:33:11 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@...wei.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
fengwei.yin@...el.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com,
shy828301@...il.com, hughd@...gle.com, david@...hat.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, sunnanyong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: filemap: avoid unnecessary major faults in
filemap_fault()
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 05:09:04PM +0800, zhangpeng (AS) wrote:
> > > + pte_t *ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
> > > + vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
> > > + if (ptep) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Recheck pte with ptl locked as the pte can be cleared
> > > + * temporarily during a read/modify/write update.
> > > + */
> > > + if (unlikely(!pte_none(ptep_get(ptep))))
> > > + ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> > > + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, vmf->ptl);
> > > + if (unlikely(ret))
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > Need to deal with ptep == NULL. Although that is high impossible.
>
> If ptep == NULL, we may just need to return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS.
> I'll add it in the next version.
no? wouldn't ptep being NULL mean that the ptep has been replaced with
a PMD entry, and thus should return NOPAGE?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists