lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYt27vXw5po2gtEqi8=hJSR7Ge3+XAS+fAHt4MiHbEXfpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Nov 2023 00:45:22 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.5 000/491] 6.5.13-rc1 review

On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 23:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.5.13 release.
> There are 491 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.5.13-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.5.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Following build warnings / errors noticed while building the
arm64 tinyconfig on stable-rc linux-6.1.y, linux-6.5.y and linux-6.6.y.

> Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>     rcu: Dump memory object info if callback function is invalid

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Build log:

In file included from kernel/rcu/update.c:49:
kernel/rcu/rcu.h: In function 'debug_rcu_head_callback':
kernel/rcu/rcu.h:255:17: error: implicit declaration of function
'kmem_dump_obj'; did you mean 'mem_dump_obj'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  255 |                 kmem_dump_obj(rhp);
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |                 mem_dump_obj
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Links,
 - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2YdNC69sBYUq3cp4iEDo4eom9RD/

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ