[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231124200258.3682979-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 21:31:24 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] mfd: intel-lpss: Revert "Add missing check for platform_get_resource"
This reverts commit d918e0d5824495a75d00b879118b098fcab36fdb.
The commit in question does not fix anything and only introduces
a duplication in the code. The main intel_lpss_probe() performs
all necessary checks.
While at it and in order of avoiding similar patches to come, add
a comment.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c | 4 +---
drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
index 5184fd1a5df1..52ffc0d9c23f 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c
@@ -182,10 +182,8 @@ static int intel_lpss_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!info)
return -ENOMEM;
+ /* No need to check mem and irq here as intel_lpss_probe() does it for us */
info->mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
- if (!info->mem)
- return -ENODEV;
-
info->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
ret = intel_lpss_probe(&pdev->dev, info);
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
index cf56cd3a40ee..709b0fb4419d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int intel_lpss_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
if (!info)
return -ENOMEM;
+ /* No need to check mem and irq here as intel_lpss_probe() does it for us */
info->mem = pci_resource_n(pdev, 0);
info->irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
--
2.43.0.rc1.1.gbec44491f096
Powered by blists - more mailing lists