linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/372] 6.1.64-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231124222543.qaM-plhi@linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2023 23:25:43 +0100
From:   Nam Cao <namcao@...utronix.de>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/372] 6.1.64-rc1 review

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 05:46:27PM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.64 release.
> There are 372 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:19:17 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.64-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

I got the following build error with riscv64 defconfig:

  CC      drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.o
In file included from /home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h:10,
                 from /home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/bpf_perf_event.h:5,
                 from /home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/include/uapi/linux/bpf_perf_event.h:11,
                 from /home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/include/linux/perf_event.h:18,
                 from /home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/include/linux/perf/riscv_pmu.h:12,
                 from /home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:14:
/home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c: In function ‘pmu_sbi_ovf_handler’:
/home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:582:40: error: ‘riscv_pmu_irq_num’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘riscv_pmu_irq’?
  582 |                 csr_clear(CSR_SIP, BIT(riscv_pmu_irq_num));
      |                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h:400:45: note: in definition of macro ‘csr_clear’
  400 |         unsigned long __v = (unsigned long)(val);               \
      |                                             ^~~
/home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:582:36: note: in expansion of macro ‘BIT’
  582 |                 csr_clear(CSR_SIP, BIT(riscv_pmu_irq_num));
      |                                    ^~~
/home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:582:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
  582 |                 csr_clear(CSR_SIP, BIT(riscv_pmu_irq_num));
      |                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h:400:45: note: in definition of macro ‘csr_clear’
  400 |         unsigned long __v = (unsigned long)(val);               \
      |                                             ^~~
/home/namcao/linux-deb/linux/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c:582:36: note: in expansion of macro ‘BIT’
  582 |                 csr_clear(CSR_SIP, BIT(riscv_pmu_irq_num));
      |                                    ^~~


Best regards,
Nam