[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d895bbb7e892507195db9ab81f88f54@milecki.pl>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 22:11:56 +0100
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: Do not expect fixed layouts to grab a layout
driver
On 2023-11-24 20:38, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Two series lived in parallel for some time, which led to this
> situation:
> - The nvmem-layout container is used for dynamic layouts
> - We now expect fixed layouts to also use the nvmem-layout container
> but
> this does not require any additional driver, the support is built-in
> the
> nvmem core.
>
> Ensure we don't refuse to probe for wrong reasons.
I pushed a pretty much identical patch to OpenWrt (I just forgot
of_node_put()): commit 61f674df4f0c ("kernel: nvmem: fix "fixed-layout"
& support "mac-base""):
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commitdiff;h=61f674df4f0ce2b1c53b0b7f6b0c1d03d99838c0
It's in use since July and seems to do the trick just fine.
Thanks for submitting this fix.
> Fixes: 27f699e578b1 ("nvmem: core: add support for fixed cells
> *layout*")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Tested-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
--
Rafał Miłecki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists