[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231124072142.2786653-6-christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:21:42 +0100
From: Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>
To: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>,
Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@...tanamicro.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/5] RISC-V: selftests: Add DTSO tests
From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>
This patch tests the dynamic memory consistency model prctl() behaviour
on RISC-V. It does not depend on CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SSDTSO or the availability
of Ssdtso, but will test other aspects if these are not given.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>
---
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/Makefile | 11 +++
tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/dtso.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/.gitignore
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/Makefile
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/dtso.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
index 4a9ff515a3a0..1421c21841f9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),riscv))
-RISCV_SUBTARGETS ?= hwprobe vector mm
+RISCV_SUBTARGETS ?= dtso hwprobe vector mm
else
RISCV_SUBTARGETS :=
endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..217d01679115
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+dtso
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a1ffbdd3da85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+# Copyright (C) 2023 VRULL
+
+CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/include
+
+TEST_GEN_PROGS := dtso
+
+include ../../lib.mk
+
+$(OUTPUT)/dtso: dtso.c ../hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S
+ $(CC) -static -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/dtso.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/dtso.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b9ca33ca6551
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/dtso/dtso.c
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* dtso - used for functional tests of memory consistency model switching
+ * at run-time.
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Christoph Muellner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>
+ */
+
+#include <sys/prctl.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+
+#include "../hwprobe/hwprobe.h"
+#include "../../kselftest_harness.h"
+
+/*
+ * We have the following cases:
+ * 1) DTSO support disabed in the kernel config:
+ * - Ssdtso is not detected
+ * - {G,S}ET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL fails with EINVAL
+ * 2) DTSO support enabled and Ssdtso not available:
+ * - Ssdtso is not detected
+ * - {G,S}ET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL works for WMO and fails for TSO with EINVAL:
+ * 3) DTSO support enabled and Ssdtso available
+ * - Ssdtso is detected
+ * - {G,S}ET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL works for WMO and TSO
+ */
+
+TEST(dtso)
+{
+ struct riscv_hwprobe pair;
+ int ret;
+ bool ssdtso_configured;
+ bool ssdtso_available;
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL);
+ ssdtso_configured = false;
+ } else {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ret == PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_WMO ||
+ ret == PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_TSO);
+ ssdtso_configured = true;
+ }
+
+ pair.key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0;
+ ret = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, 0, NULL, 0);
+ ASSERT_GE(ret, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(pair.key, RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0);
+ ssdtso_available = !!(pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_SSDTSO);
+
+ if (ssdtso_configured) {
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ret == PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_WMO ||
+ ret == PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_TSO);
+
+ if (ssdtso_available) {
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL,
+ PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_TSO);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ret == PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_TSO);
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("Ssdtso not available\n");
+ }
+
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL,
+ PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_WMO);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0);
+ ret = prctl(PR_GET_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ret == PR_MEMORY_CONSISTENCY_MODEL_RISCV_WMO);
+ } else {
+ ASSERT_EQ(ssdtso_available, false);
+ ksft_test_result_skip("Ssdtso not configured\n");
+ }
+}
+
+TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.41.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists