[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f3080ca-cde6-2473-4679-a79fa744eb70@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:12:30 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 1/6] md: remove useless debug code to print
configuration
Hi,
在 2023/11/24 16:17, Song Liu 写道:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 7:25 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>
>> One the one hand, print_conf() can be called without grabbing
>> 'reconfig_mtuex' and current rcu protection to access rdev through 'conf'
>> is not safe. Fortunately, there is a separate rcu protection to access
>> rdev from 'mddev->disks', and rdev is always removed from 'conf' before
>> 'mddev->disks'.
>>
>> On the other hand, print_conf() is just used for debug,
>> and user can always grab such information(/proc/mdstat and mdadm).
>>
>> There is no need to always enable this debug and try to fix misuse rcu
>> protection for accessing rdev from 'conf', hence remove print_conf().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> I wouldn't call these debug functions useless. There is probably some
> users who use them for debugging (or even in some automations).
> How hard is it to keep these functions? Can we just add some lockdep
> to these functions to make sure they are called from safe places?
Okay, I can keep these debug code, and since these code are
dereferencing rdev from conf, and they need new syncronization:
1) dereference rdev from mddev->disks instead of conf, and use
rdev->raid_disk >= 0 to judge if this rdev is in conf. There might
be a race window that rdev can be removed from conf, however, I think
this dones't matter. Or:
2) grab 'active_io' before print_conf(), to make sure rdev won't be
removed from conf.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
> [...]
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists