linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Clean up hs_phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:32:37 +0530
From:   Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>, <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: dwc3: Clean up hs_phy_irq in
 bindings

> 
> Thanks for sorting this out.
> 
> It seems like we have a few combinations of these interrupts and we
> should probably try to define the order for these once and for all and
> update the current devicetrees to match (even if it means adding new
> interrupts in the middle).
> 
> Instead of adding separate compatibles for the controllers without SS
> support, I suggest keeping that interrupt last as an optional one.
> 
> But IIUC we essentially have something like:
> 
> qusb2-:
> 
> 	- const: qusb2_phy
> 	- const: pwr_event
> 	- const: ss_phy_irq	(optional)
> 
> qusb2:
> 
> 	- const: hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: qusb2_phy
> 	- const: pwr_event
> 	- const: ss_phy_irq	(optional)
> 
> qusb2+:
> 
> 	- const: hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: qusb2_phy
> 	- const: dp_hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: dm_hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: pwr_event
> 	- const: ss_phy_irq	(optional)
> 

This combination doesn't exist. So we can skip this one.

> femto-:
> 	- const: dp_hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: dm_hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: pwr_event
> 	- const: ss_phy_irq	(optional)
> 
> femto:
> 	- const: hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: dp_hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: dm_hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: pwr_event
> 	- const: ss_phy_irq	(optional)
> 
> Does this look like it would cover all of our currents SoCs?
> 
> Do all of them have the pwr_event interrupt?
> 
Yes. From whatever targets I was able to find, only one of them didn't 
have the power_event irq. Rest all of them had. I will recheck that 
particular one again.

> Note that DP comes before DM above as that seems like the natural order
> of these (plus before minus).
> 
> Now if the HS interrupt is truly unusable, I guess we can consider
> dropping it throughout and the above becomes just three permutations
> instead, which can even be expressed along the lines of:
> 

Infact, I wanted to do this but since you mentioned before that if HW 
has it, we must describe it, I kept it in. But since this functionality 
is confirmed to be mutually exclusive of qusb2/{dp/dm}, I am aligned to 
skip it in bindings and drop it in DT.

> 	- anyOf:
> 	  - items:
> 	    - const: qusb2_phy
> 	  - items:
> 	    - const: dp_hs_phy_irq
> 	    - const: dm_hs_phy_irq
> 	- const: pwr_event
> 	- const: ss_phy_irq	(optional)
> 

This must cover all cases AFAIK. How about we keep pwr_event also 
optional for time being. The ones I am not able to find also would come 
up under still binding block.

Regards,
Krishna,