[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6d80982-1674-d0c4-9dbe-94d77079f6ba@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:05:00 +0530
From: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>,
<phone-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Move video-firmware to
chrome-common
On 11/24/2023 6:23 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 14:30, Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/24/2023 5:05 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> On Fri Nov 24, 2023 at 7:38 AM CET, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/22/2023 7:50 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>>> On Wed Nov 22, 2023 at 2:17 PM CET, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/2/2023 7:50 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>>>>> If the video-firmware node is present, the venus driver assumes we're on
>>>>>>> a system that doesn't use TZ for starting venus, like on ChromeOS
>>>>>>> devices.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Move the video-firmware node to chrome-common.dtsi so we can use venus
>>>>>>> on a non-ChromeOS devices.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At the same time also disable the venus node by default in the dtsi,
>>>>>>> like it's done on other SoCs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-chrome-common.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 6 ++----
>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-chrome-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-chrome-common.dtsi
>>>>>>> index 5d462ae14ba1..cd491e46666d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-chrome-common.dtsi
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-chrome-common.dtsi
>>>>>>> @@ -104,6 +104,14 @@ &scm {
>>>>>>> dma-coherent;
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +&venus {
>>>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + video-firmware {
>>>>>>> + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x21a2 0x0>;
>>>>>>> + };
>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> &watchdog {
>>>>>>> status = "okay";
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>>>>>> index 66f1eb83cca7..fa53f54d4675 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>>>>>>> @@ -3740,6 +3740,8 @@ venus: video-codec@...0000 {
>>>>>>> <&apps_smmu 0x2184 0x20>;
>>>> 0x2184 is a secure SID. I think qcm6490-fairphone-fp5.dts needs to override the
>>>> iommus property as well to retain only the non secure SID i.e 0x2180 ? I am
>>>> seeing below crash
>>>>
>>>> Call trace:
>>>> [ 47.663593] qcom_smmu_write_s2cr+0x64/0xa4
>>>> [ 47.663616] arm_smmu_attach_dev+0x120/0x284
>>>> [ 47.663647] __iommu_attach_device+0x24/0xf8
>>>> [ 47.676845] __iommu_device_set_domain+0x70/0xd0
>>>> [ 47.681632] __iommu_group_set_domain_internal+0x60/0x1b4
>>>> [ 47.687218] iommu_setup_default_domain+0x358/0x418
>>>> [ 47.692258] __iommu_probe_device+0x3e4/0x404
>>>>
>>>> Could you please reconfirm if Video SID 0x2184 (and mask) is allowed by the
>>>> qcm6490-fairphone-fp5 hardware having TZ ?
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On FP5 it seems it's no problem to have both SIDs in there, probe and
>>> using venus appears to work fine.
>>>
>>> Are you using different firmware than QCM6490.LA.3.0 on the device where
>>> you tested this?
>> I was testing this on RB3 board which uses firmware [1].
>
> There is something wrong here.
>
> RB3 board uses venus-5.2
> RB5 board uses vpu-1.0
> Only sc7280 uses vpu-2.0
Tested on QCM6490 IDP board, which is QCOM internal board similar to RB3 gen2.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vikash
>>
>> [1]
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/qcom/vpu-2.0
>>
>>>>
>>>>>>> memory-region = <&video_mem>;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + status = "disabled";
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> video-decoder {
>>>>>>> compatible = "venus-decoder";
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>> @@ -3748,10 +3750,6 @@ video-encoder {
>>>>>>> compatible = "venus-encoder";
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - video-firmware {
>>>>>>> - iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x21a2 0x0>;
>>>>>>> - };
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> venus_opp_table: opp-table {
>>>>>>> compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes look good. Is this tested on SC7280 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Vikash,
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't test it myself on sc7280 (just qcm6490-fp5) but dtx_diff
>>>>> reports no differences except for status = okay property being added, so
>>>>> there should be no change on those boards. See below.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Luca
>>>>
>>>> I tested on SC7280 (herobrine) and all good.
>>>
>>> Great, thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Luca
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Vikash
>>>
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists