[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c3a07912-07da-4965-94b8-3c0d8889ddc4@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 14:50:58 +0100
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
Nicolas Belin <nbelin@...libre.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...nel.org>,
Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/12] dt-bindings: phy: amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog:
drop unneeded reg property and example
Hi Conor,
On 24/11/2023 13:36, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 09:41:15AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> The amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog is a feature of the simple-mfd
>> amlogic,meson-axg-hhi-sysctrl system control register zone which is an
>> intermixed registers zone, thus it's very hard to define clear ranges for
>> each SoC controlled features even if possible.
>>
>> The amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog was wrongly documented as an independent
>> register range, which is not the reality, thus fix the bindings by dropping
>> the reg property now it's referred from amlogic,meson-gx-hhi-sysctrl.yaml
>> and documented as a subnode of amlogic,meson-axg-hhi-sysctrl.
>>
>> Also drop the unnecessary example, the top level bindings example should
>> be enough.
>>
>> Fixes: 76ab79f9726c ("dt-bindings: phy: add Amlogic G12A Analog MIPI D-PHY bindings")
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>
> I feel like I left a tag on this one before, but I can't remember.
> Perhaps I missed the conclusion to the discussion to the discussion with
> Rob about whether having "reg" was desirable that lead to a tag being
> dropped?
I checked again and nope, not tag, but Rob's question was legitimate and I reworded
and clarified the commit message following your reviews.
On the other side you suggested a Fixes tag, which I added.
The rewording is about why reg doesn't make sense on the nature of the memory
region and it doesn't make sense here like other similar nodes.
Neil
>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/phy/amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog.yaml | 12 ------------
>> 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog.yaml
>> index c8c83acfb871..81c2654b7e57 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog.yaml
>> @@ -16,20 +16,8 @@ properties:
>> "#phy-cells":
>> const: 0
>>
>> - reg:
>> - maxItems: 1
>> -
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - - reg
>> - "#phy-cells"
>>
>> additionalProperties: false
>> -
>> -examples:
>> - - |
>> - phy@0 {
>> - compatible = "amlogic,g12a-mipi-dphy-analog";
>> - reg = <0x0 0xc>;
>> - #phy-cells = <0>;
>> - };
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists