[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231124-eintagsfliege-brennen-385b1d96defe@brauner>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 16:21:46 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kselftest/clone3: Make test names for set_tid test stable
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 02:43:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> The test results reported for the clone3_set_tid tests interact poorly with
> automation for running kselftest since the reported test names include TIDs
> dynamically allocated at runtime. A lot of automation for running kselftest
> will compare runs by looking at the test name to identify if the same test
> is being run so changing names make it look like the testsuite has been
> updated to include new tests. This makes the results display less clearly
> and breaks cases like bisection.
>
> Address this by providing a brief description of the tests and logging that
> along with the stable parameters for the test currently logged. The TIDs
> are already logged separately in existing logging except for the final test
> which has a new log message added. We also tweak the formatting of the
> logging of expected/actual values for clarity.
>
> There are still issues with the logging of skipped tests (many are simply
> not logged at all when skipped and all are logged with different names) but
> these are less disruptive since the skips are all based on not being run as
> root, a condition likely to be stable for a given test system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
May I already acked this. Not sure,
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists