[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023112458-stature-commuting-c66f@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:27:48 +0000
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Søren Andersen <san@...v.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] introduce priority-based shutdown support
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 03:21:40PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 03:05:47PM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > Anyway, this is ripe for problems and issues in the long-run, what is so
> > special about this hardware that it can not just shutdown in the
> > existing order that it has to be "first" over everyone else? What
> > exactly does this prevent and what devices are requiring this?
>
> > And most importantly, what has changed in the past 20+ years to
> > suddenly require this new functionality and how does any other operating
> > system handle it?
>
> This came out of some discussions about trying to handle emergency power
> failure notifications.
I'm sorry, but I don't know what that means. Are you saying that the
kernel is now going to try to provide a hard guarantee that some devices
are going to be shut down in X number of seconds when asked? If so, why
not do this in userspace?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists