linux-kernel - Re: [REGRESSION]: mmap performance regression starting with k-6.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <33b55166-00a3-4947-ad4f-387ddfa2c7a4@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2023 16:29:53 +0100
From:   "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Chun Ng <chunn@...dia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Ankita Garg <ankitag@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION]: mmap performance regression starting with k-6.1

On 24.11.23 16:06, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>  Mostly I ignore him now, but when he's instructing a bot
> to harass me, that crosses a line.

I'm curious: How is regzbot able to harass you? It as of now and likely
for at least another year is not able to send mails on its own -- by
design, as I wanted to ensure it doesn't harass anyone.

Sure, I might manually send a mail if something looks stalled in
regzbot. But before I do that I always do a sanity check to avoid
annoying people. Do I sometimes make mistakes or miss something in that
process? Sure. But that happens to all of us.

Ciao, Thorsten