linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/pipe: Fix lockdep false-positive in watchqueue pipe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1210483.1700841227@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2023 15:53:47 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/pipe: Fix lockdep false-positive in watchqueue pipe_write()

Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:

> +	/*
> +	 * Reject writing to watch queue pipes before the point where we lock
> +	 * the pipe.
> +	 * Otherwise, lockdep would be unhappy if the caller already has another
> +	 * pipe locked.
> +	 * If we had to support locking a normal pipe and a notification pipe at
> +	 * the same time, we could set up lockdep annotations for that, but
> +	 * since we don't actually need that, it's simpler to just bail here.
> +	 */
> +	if (pipe_has_watch_queue(pipe))
> +		return -EXDEV;
> +

Linus wanted it to be possible for the user to write to a notificaiton pipe.

David