lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231126100920.094bf6ad@rorschach.local.home>
Date:   Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:09:20 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] tracing/eventfs: Fixes for v6.7-rc2

On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:04:57 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>

Ignore Mathieu's email address above. It was just a glitch in my scripts ;-)

-- Steve

> 
> Linus,
> 
> eventfs fixes:
> 
> - With the usage of simple_recursive_remove() recommended by Al Viro,
>   the code should not be calling "d_invalidate()" itself. Doing so
>   is causing crashes. The code was calling d_invalidate() on the race
>   of trying to look up a file while the parent was being deleted.
>   This was detected, and the added dentry was having d_invalidate() called
>   on it, but the deletion of the directory was also calling d_invalidate()
>   on that same dentry.
> 
> - A fix to not free the eventfs_inode (ei) until the last dput() was called
>   on its ei->dentry made the ei->dentry exist even after it was marked
>   for free by setting the ei->is_freed. But code elsewhere still was
>   checking if ei->dentry was NULL if ei->is_freed is set and would
>   trigger WARN_ON if that was the case. That's no longer true and there
>   should not be any warnings when it is true.
> 
> - Use GFP_NOFS for allocations done under eventfs_mutex.
>   The eventfs_mutex can be taken on file system reclaim, make sure
>   that allocations done under that mutex do not trigger file system
>   reclaim.
> 
> - Clean up code by moving the taking of inode_lock out of the helper
>   functions and into where they are needed, and not use the
>   parameter to know to take it or not. It must always be held but
>   some callers of the helper function have it taken when they were
>   called.
> 
> - Warn if the inode_lock is not held in the helper functions.
> 
> - Warn if eventfs_start_creating() is called without a parent.
>   As eventfs is underneath tracefs, all files created will have
>   a parent (the top one will have a tracefs parent).
> 
> Tracing update;
> 
> - Add Mathieu Desnoyers as an official reviewer of the tracing sub system.
> 
> 
> Please pull the latest trace-v6.7-rc2 tree, which can be found at:
> 
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace.git
> trace-v6.7-rc2
> 
> Tag SHA1: 94eabb90d0195e49d78e7714be7b239284ee1e96
> Head SHA1: 76d9eafff4484547ed9e606c8227ac9799a9f2da
> 
> 
> Mathieu Desnoyers (1):
>       MAINTAINERS: TRACING: Add Mathieu Desnoyers as Reviewer
> 
> Steven Rostedt (Google) (6):
>       eventfs: Remove expectation that ei->is_freed means ei->dentry == NULL
>       eventfs: Do not invalidate dentry in create_file/dir_dentry()
>       eventfs: Use GFP_NOFS for allocation when eventfs_mutex is held
>       eventfs: Move taking of inode_lock into dcache_dir_open_wrapper()
>       eventfs: Do not allow NULL parent to eventfs_start_creating()
>       eventfs: Make sure that parent->d_inode is locked in creating files/dirs
> 
> ----
>  MAINTAINERS              |  1 +
>  fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  fs/tracefs/inode.c       | 13 +++-------
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> ---------------------------
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index ea790149af79..a2d4ef4d90f6 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -22078,6 +22078,7 @@ F:	drivers/watchdog/tqmx86_wdt.c
>  TRACING
>  M:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>  M:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> +R:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
>  L:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>  L:	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>  S:	Maintained
> diff --git a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> index f8a594a50ae6..0b90869fd805 100644
> --- a/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> +++ b/fs/tracefs/event_inode.c
> @@ -27,16 +27,16 @@
>  /*
>   * eventfs_mutex protects the eventfs_inode (ei) dentry. Any access
>   * to the ei->dentry must be done under this mutex and after checking
> - * if ei->is_freed is not set. The ei->dentry is released under the
> - * mutex at the same time ei->is_freed is set. If ei->is_freed is set
> - * then the ei->dentry is invalid.
> + * if ei->is_freed is not set. When ei->is_freed is set, the dentry
> + * is on its way to being freed after the last dput() is made on it.
>   */
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(eventfs_mutex);
>  
>  /*
>   * The eventfs_inode (ei) itself is protected by SRCU. It is released from
>   * its parent's list and will have is_freed set (under eventfs_mutex).
> - * After the SRCU grace period is over, the ei may be freed.
> + * After the SRCU grace period is over and the last dput() is called
> + * the ei is freed.
>   */
>  DEFINE_STATIC_SRCU(eventfs_srcu);
>  
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int eventfs_set_attr(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct dentry *dentry,
>  	if (!(dentry->d_inode->i_mode & S_IFDIR)) {
>  		if (!ei->entry_attrs) {
>  			ei->entry_attrs = kzalloc(sizeof(*ei->entry_attrs) * ei->nr_entries,
> -						  GFP_KERNEL);
> +						  GFP_NOFS);
>  			if (!ei->entry_attrs) {
>  				ret = -ENOMEM;
>  				goto out;
> @@ -326,7 +326,8 @@ create_file_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *ei, int idx,
>  	struct eventfs_attr *attr = NULL;
>  	struct dentry **e_dentry = &ei->d_children[idx];
>  	struct dentry *dentry;
> -	bool invalidate = false;
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!inode_is_locked(parent->d_inode));
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
>  	if (ei->is_freed) {
> @@ -348,15 +349,8 @@ create_file_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *ei, int idx,
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
>  
> -	/* The lookup already has the parent->d_inode locked */
> -	if (!lookup)
> -		inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
> -
>  	dentry = create_file(name, mode, attr, parent, data, fops);
>  
> -	if (!lookup)
> -		inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry)) {
> @@ -365,12 +359,14 @@ create_file_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *ei, int idx,
>  		 * created the dentry for this e_dentry. In which case
>  		 * use that one.
>  		 *
> -		 * Note, with the mutex held, the e_dentry cannot have content
> -		 * and the ei->is_freed be true at the same time.
> +		 * If ei->is_freed is set, the e_dentry is currently on its
> +		 * way to being freed, don't return it. If e_dentry is NULL
> +		 * it means it was already freed.
>  		 */
> -		dentry = *e_dentry;
> -		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dentry && ei->is_freed))
> +		if (ei->is_freed)
>  			dentry = NULL;
> +		else
> +			dentry = *e_dentry;
>  		/* The lookup does not need to up the dentry refcount */
>  		if (dentry && !lookup)
>  			dget(dentry);
> @@ -387,17 +383,14 @@ create_file_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *ei, int idx,
>  		 * Otherwise it means two dentries exist with the same name.
>  		 */
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(!ei->is_freed);
> -		invalidate = true;
> +		dentry = NULL;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
>  
> -	if (invalidate)
> -		d_invalidate(dentry);
> -
> -	if (lookup || invalidate)
> +	if (lookup)
>  		dput(dentry);
>  
> -	return invalidate ? NULL : dentry;
> +	return dentry;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -437,9 +430,10 @@ static struct dentry *
>  create_dir_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *pei, struct eventfs_inode *ei,
>  		  struct dentry *parent, bool lookup)
>  {
> -	bool invalidate = false;
>  	struct dentry *dentry = NULL;
>  
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!inode_is_locked(parent->d_inode));
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
>  	if (pei->is_freed || ei->is_freed) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
> @@ -456,15 +450,8 @@ create_dir_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *pei, struct eventfs_inode *ei,
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
>  
> -	/* The lookup already has the parent->d_inode locked */
> -	if (!lookup)
> -		inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
> -
>  	dentry = create_dir(ei, parent);
>  
> -	if (!lookup)
> -		inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
> -
>  	mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
>  
>  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry) && !ei->is_freed) {
> @@ -473,8 +460,8 @@ create_dir_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *pei, struct eventfs_inode *ei,
>  		 * created the dentry for this e_dentry. In which case
>  		 * use that one.
>  		 *
> -		 * Note, with the mutex held, the e_dentry cannot have content
> -		 * and the ei->is_freed be true at the same time.
> +		 * If ei->is_freed is set, the e_dentry is currently on its
> +		 * way to being freed.
>  		 */
>  		dentry = ei->dentry;
>  		if (dentry && !lookup)
> @@ -493,16 +480,14 @@ create_dir_dentry(struct eventfs_inode *pei, struct eventfs_inode *ei,
>  		 * Otherwise it means two dentries exist with the same name.
>  		 */
>  		WARN_ON_ONCE(!ei->is_freed);
> -		invalidate = true;
> +		dentry = NULL;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
> -	if (invalidate)
> -		d_invalidate(dentry);
>  
> -	if (lookup || invalidate)
> +	if (lookup)
>  		dput(dentry);
>  
> -	return invalidate ? NULL : dentry;
> +	return dentry;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -632,7 +617,7 @@ static int add_dentries(struct dentry ***dentries, struct dentry *d, int cnt)
>  {
>  	struct dentry **tmp;
>  
> -	tmp = krealloc(*dentries, sizeof(d) * (cnt + 2), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	tmp = krealloc(*dentries, sizeof(d) * (cnt + 2), GFP_NOFS);
>  	if (!tmp)
>  		return -1;
>  	tmp[cnt] = d;
> @@ -698,6 +683,7 @@ static int dcache_dir_open_wrapper(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> +	inode_lock(parent->d_inode);
>  	list_for_each_entry_srcu(ei_child, &ei->children, list,
>  				 srcu_read_lock_held(&eventfs_srcu)) {
>  		d = create_dir_dentry(ei, ei_child, parent, false);
> @@ -730,6 +716,7 @@ static int dcache_dir_open_wrapper(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  			cnt++;
>  		}
>  	}
> +	inode_unlock(parent->d_inode);
>  	srcu_read_unlock(&eventfs_srcu, idx);
>  	ret = dcache_dir_open(inode, file);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/tracefs/inode.c b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> index 5b54948514fe..ae648deed019 100644
> --- a/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/tracefs/inode.c
> @@ -509,20 +509,15 @@ struct dentry *eventfs_start_creating(const char *name, struct dentry *parent)
>  	struct dentry *dentry;
>  	int error;
>  
> +	/* Must always have a parent. */
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!parent))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
>  	error = simple_pin_fs(&trace_fs_type, &tracefs_mount,
>  			      &tracefs_mount_count);
>  	if (error)
>  		return ERR_PTR(error);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If the parent is not specified, we create it in the root.
> -	 * We need the root dentry to do this, which is in the super
> -	 * block. A pointer to that is in the struct vfsmount that we
> -	 * have around.
> -	 */
> -	if (!parent)
> -		parent = tracefs_mount->mnt_root;
> -
>  	if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(parent->d_inode)))
>  		dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>  	else

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ