[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZWKb56E2kKngcWW5@archie.me>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 08:14:15 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
Linux Kernel Hardening <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regression@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Boot crash on v6.7-rc2
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 10:24:58AM +0000, Joey Gouly wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just hit a boot crash on v6.7-rc2 (arm64, FVP model):
>
> [ 1.418845] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000517
> [ 1.418855] Mem abort info:
> [ 1.418860] ESR = 0x0000000096000004
> [ 1.418867] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> [ 1.418876] SET = 0, FnV = 0
> [ 1.418882] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> [ 1.418889] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
> [ 1.418897] Data abort info:
> [ 1.418902] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
> [ 1.418910] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> [ 1.418919] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
> [ 1.418928] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000881835000
> [ 1.418938] [0000000000000517] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
> [ 1.418952] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 1.418961] Modules linked in:
> [ 1.418969] CPU: 0 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G T 6.7.0-rc2-dirty #4191 40d10cdc812c74fd5dc5d91e2452ff6f1e5f4b4a
> [ 1.418984] Hardware name: FVP Base RevC (DT)
> [ 1.418992] Workqueue: mld mld_ifc_work
> [ 1.419003] pstate: 101402005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> [ 1.419016] pc : ___neigh_create+0x790/0x9c8
> [ 1.419028] lr : ___neigh_create+0x270/0x9c8
> [ 1.419041] sp : ffff8000800c3a20
> [ 1.419048] x29: ffff8000800c3a20 x28: ffffd7c64c921078 x27: ffff00080188bd50
> [ 1.419066] x26: ffff00080183a30c x25: ffff00080188bda0 x24: ffff00080183a300
> [ 1.419084] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000010 x21: ffff00080188bcc0
> [ 1.419102] x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff0008003ef000 x18: 0000000000000014
> [ 1.419119] x17: 00000000cf0f2572 x16: 0000000080faa78d x15: 00000000b79921ac
> [ 1.419137] x14: ffff00087ff332c0 x13: 1600000000000000 x12: 00000000000002ff
> [ 1.419155] x11: 000000007c2c4dbd x10: 0000000000000003 x9 : 0000000000000000
> [ 1.419172] x8 : ffff00080188bd80 x7 : 00000000be3df655 x6 : 00000000f1691d6f
> [ 1.419190] x5 : 000000007c2c4dbd x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 000000008eb8ab5b
> [ 1.419207] x2 : 000000000000050f x1 : 000000000000001d x0 : 00000000000002ff
> [ 1.419225] Call trace:
> [ 1.419230] ___neigh_create+0x790/0x9c8
> [ 1.419243] __neigh_create+0x18/0x20
> [ 1.419255] ip6_finish_output2+0x5f8/0x8c4
> [ 1.419267] ip6_finish_output+0x1f0/0x258
> [ 1.419279] ip6_output+0x70/0x1cc
> [ 1.419291] NF_HOOK.constprop.0+0x4c/0xd8
> [ 1.419302] mld_sendpack+0x1b4/0x394
> [ 1.419313] mld_ifc_work+0x1d4/0x4b4
>
> I tracked it down to the following line in net/core/neighbour.c ___neigh_create:
> memcpy(n->primary_key, pkey, key_len);
>
> I did this by surrounding the memcpy with BUG():
> BUG_ON(n->tbl != tbl);
> memcpy(n->primary_key, pkey, key_len);
> BUG_ON(n->tbl != tbl);
>
> And it was crashing on the second one.
>
> Checking `struct neighbour`:
>
> struct neighbour {
> struct neighbour __rcu *next;
> struct neigh_table *tbl;
> .. fields ..
> u8 primary_key[0];
> } __randomize_layout;
>
> Due to the `__randomize_layout`, `primary_key` field is being placed before `tbl` (actually it's the same address since it's a 0 length array). That means the memcpy() corrupts the tbl pointer.
>
> I think I just got unlucky with my CONFIG_RANDSTRUCT seed (I can provide it if needed), it doesn't look as if it's a new issue.
>
> I couldn't reproduce directly on v6.6 (the offsets for `tbl` and `primary_key` didn't overlap).
> However I tried changing the zero-length-array to a flexible one:
>
> + DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(u8, primary_key);
> + u8 primary_key[0];
>
> Then the field offsets ended up overlapping, and I also got the same crash on v6.6.
>
Thanks for the well-handled regression report. I'm adding it to regzbot
for tracking:
#regzbot ^introduced: 1ee60356c2dca9
#regzbot title: Boot crash caused by true flexible array warning
#regzbot fix: neighbour: Fix __randomize_layout crash in struct neighbour
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists