[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231126170700.550d20e7@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:07:00 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com, chenhuiz@...s.com,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_mpu6050: return callee's error code
rather than -EINVAL
On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 10:07:53 +0800
Su Hui <suhui@...china.com> wrote:
> regmap_bulk_write()/regmap_bulk_read() return zero or negative error
> code, return the callee's error code is better than '-EINVAL'.
Thanks and fully agree - though one small tweak I made whilst applying is mentioned
below.
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for 0-day
to see if we missed anything.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> index a9a5fb266ef1..5ded0781797c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/inv_mpu_core.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_sensor_set(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int reg,
> ind = (axis - IIO_MOD_X) * 2;
> result = regmap_bulk_write(st->map, reg + ind, &d, sizeof(d));
> if (result)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return result;
>
> return 0;
I tweaked this to go further
return regmap_bulk_write();
> }
> @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static int inv_mpu6050_sensor_show(struct inv_mpu6050_state *st, int reg,
> ind = (axis - IIO_MOD_X) * 2;
> result = regmap_bulk_read(st->map, reg + ind, &d, sizeof(d));
> if (result)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return result;
> *val = (short)be16_to_cpup(&d);
>
> return IIO_VAL_INT;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists