[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <240c0d9a-38d9-44fc-a56d-cdd88d9144a9@lunn.ch>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 19:19:16 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/3] net: phy: extend PHY package API to support
multiple global address
> > static inline int phy_package_read(struct phy_device *phydev,
> > unsigned int addr_offset, u32 regnum)
> > {
> > struct phy_package_shared *shared = phydev->shared;
> > int addr = shared->base_addr + addr_offset;
>
> Isn't this problematic if shared is NULL?
Duh! Yes, it is. But why should shared be NULL? The driver is doing a
read on the package before the package is created. That is a bug. So
an Opps is O.K, it helps find the bug. So i would drop the test for
!shared.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists