[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65638d68.050a0220.17be1.86fe@mx.google.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 19:24:37 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/3] net: phy: add support for PHY package MMD
read/write
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 07:14:52PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 01:37:48AM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Some PHY in PHY package may require to read/write MMD regs to correctly
> > configure the PHY package.
> >
> > Add support for these additional required function in both lock and no
> > lock variant.
>
> You are assuming the PHY only supports C45 over C22. But what about
> those PHYs which have native C45? And maybe don't have C22 at all?
>
> You should refactor the code of __phy_read_mmd() into a helper and use
> it here.
>
Have to be honest here and chose the ""easy"" way. Was a little scared
by all the complexity with mmd with C45 and C22... The idea was to add
C22 support for now and if used by others extend the function. But I
guess with the generic approach we are taking it's better to handle it
now. Will update this in v2.
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists