linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] wifi: ath11k: Use DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() for ath11k_htc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5555ad6-6991-4fca-864f-355d2fae9ae1@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2023 08:32:51 -0800
From:   Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
CC:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>, <ath11k@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] wifi: ath11k: Use DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() for
 ath11k_htc_record

On 11/27/2023 8:23 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/27/23 10:14, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> Transform the zero-length array in ath11k_htc_record into a proper
>> flexible array via the DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY() macro. This helps with
>> ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h
>> index 84971cc9251c..e0434b29df70 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/htc.h
>> @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ struct ath11k_htc_credit_report {
>>   struct ath11k_htc_record {
>>   	struct ath11k_htc_record_hdr hdr;
>>   	union {
>> -		struct ath11k_htc_credit_report credit_report[0];
>> +		DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct ath11k_htc_credit_report, credit_report);
>>   	};
> 
> Why not removing the `union` and just do a direct transformation [0] -> [ ] ?

No reason other than staying consistent with ath10k.
Will see if Kalle has an opinion on this.

/jeff