Message-ID: <CA+G9fYsk_5WxkeQHqh_5McrkOBGW+4yF81=TdrNyPQOSZxz7Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 00:55:16 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/366] 6.1.64-rc4 review

On Sun, 26 Nov 2023 at 21:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.64 release.
> There are 366 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:43:06 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.64-rc4.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Results from Linaro's test farm.
LTP syscalls preadv03 fails on 6.1.64-rc4 on all devices.

As Daniel bisection reports on stable-rc linux.5.15.y review thread.
The LTP syscalls preadv03 test regression is due to following commit

ext4: properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct IO
  commit 91562895f8030cb9a0470b1db49de79346a69f91 upstream.

Link:
 - https://lore.kernel.org/stable/81a11ebe-ea47-4e21-b5eb-536b1a723168@linaro.org/

NOTE:
Latest kselftests and perf from latest stable-rc testing on the older
stable-rc branches are reasons for these failures.

1) selftests: seccomp: seccomp_bpf - fails on all arm64 devices.

2) Perf: PMU_events_subtest_1 / 2  - fails on all qemu-armv7 and TI x15 devices
These perf failures are also noticed on the mainline / vanilla kernel on 32-bit

Links:
 - https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYsUXnx4HWyBOGMi3Ko_jT6Y_ejp5ZhcsU+8+_8NUsd=vA@mail.gmail.com/

## Build
* kernel: 6.1.64-rc4
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-6.1.y
* git commit: 40fd07331b8798ff5e5aca3ae85946c5c74ac226
* git describe: v6.1.63-367-g40fd07331b87
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.63-367-g40fd07331b87

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.63)

* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, ltp-syscalls
  - preadv03
  - preadv03_64

* qemu-arm64, ltp-syscalls
  - preadv03
  - preadv03_64

* qemu-armv7, ltp-syscalls
  - preadv03
  - preadv03_64

* qemu-armv7, perf
  - PMU_events_subtest_1
  - PMU_events_subtest_2

* qemu-i386, ltp-syscalls
  - preadv03
  - preadv03_64

* qemu-x86_64, ltp-syscalls
  - preadv03
  - preadv03_64

* x15, perf
  - PMU_events_subtest_1
  - PMU_events_subtest_2

* x86_64-clang, ltp-syscalls
  - preadv03
  - preadv03_64

* bcm2711-rpi-4-b, kselftest-seccomp
  - seccomp_seccomp_bpf

* juno-r2, kselftest-seccomp
  - seccomp_seccomp_bpf

* dragonboard-410c, kselftest-seccomp
  - seccomp_seccomp_bpf

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.63)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.63)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.63)

## Test result summary
total: 136417, pass: 115381, fail: 2897, skip: 18004, xfail: 135

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 151 total, 151 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 52 total, 52 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 15 total, 15 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-filesystems-epoll
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-ftrace
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* libgpiod
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* perf
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists