[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <PH0PR18MB4734C1F52388E5238C7F8D40C7BDA@PH0PR18MB4734.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 04:43:41 +0000
From: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Haseeb Gani <hgani@...vell.com>,
Vimlesh Kumar <vimleshk@...vell.com>,
"egallen@...hat.com" <egallen@...hat.com>,
"mschmidt@...hat.com" <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"wizhao@...hat.com" <wizhao@...hat.com>,
"konguyen@...hat.com" <konguyen@...hat.com>,
"jesse.brandeburg@...el.com" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Suman Ghosh <sumang@...vell.com>,
Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>,
Sathesh B Edara <sedara@...vell.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] octeon_ep: get max rx packet
length from firmware
Hi Simon,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 10:38 PM
> To: Shinas Rasheed <srasheed@...vell.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Haseeb Gani
> <hgani@...vell.com>; Vimlesh Kumar <vimleshk@...vell.com>;
> egallen@...hat.com; mschmidt@...hat.com; pabeni@...hat.com;
> kuba@...nel.org; davem@...emloft.net; wizhao@...hat.com;
> konguyen@...hat.com; jesse.brandeburg@...el.com; Suman Ghosh
> <sumang@...vell.com>; Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>;
> Sathesh B Edara <sedara@...vell.com>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] octeon_ep: get max rx packet
> length from firmware
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> > index 2da00a701df2..423eec5ff3ad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeon_ep/octep_main.c
> > @@ -1377,8 +1378,15 @@ static int octep_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> >
> > netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG;
> > netdev->features |= netdev->hw_features;
> > +
> > + max_rx_pktlen = octep_ctrl_net_get_mtu(octep_dev,
> OCTEP_CTRL_NET_INVALID_VFID);
> > + if (max_rx_pktlen < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&octep_dev->pdev->dev,
> > + "Failed to get max receive packet size; err = %d\n",
> max_rx_pktlen);
> > + goto register_dev_err;
>
> Hi Shinas,
>
> This jump will cause this function to return err. But err is 0 here.
> Perhaps it should be set to a negative error value instead?
Yes I think that was a slight erroneous oversight. I see that this patch has been accepted. I shall commit a fix for the same after review in the net branch doing the same.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists