linux-kernel - Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87jzq2ixtm.fsf@vps.thesusis.net>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:24:53 -0500
From:   Phillip Susi <phill@...susis.net>
To:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc:     Christian König 
        <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@....com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
Subject: Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel

Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com> writes:

>> In that case those are the already known problems with the scheduler
>> changes, aren't they?
>
> Yes.  Those changes went into 6.7 though, not 6.6 AFAIK.  Maybe I'm
> misunderstanding what the original report was actually testing.  If it
> was 6.7, then try reverting:
> 56e449603f0ac580700621a356d35d5716a62ce5
> b70438004a14f4d0f9890b3297cd66248728546c

At some point it was suggested that I file a gitlab issue, but I took
this to mean it was already known and being worked on.  -rc3 came out
today and still has the problem.  Is there a known issue I could track?