linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/14] net: intel: start The Great Code Dedup + Page Pool for iavf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZWRbusSZ4v0SuWmF@nanopsycho>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2023 10:04:58 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
        Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
        Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
        Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        David Christensen <drc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/14] net: intel: start The Great Code Dedup
 + Page Pool for iavf

Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 04:47:18PM CET, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com wrote:
>Here's a two-shot: introduce Intel Ethernet common library (libie) and
>switch iavf to Page Pool. Details are in the commit messages; here's
>a summary:
>
>Not a secret there's a ton of code duplication between two and more Intel
>ethernet modules. Before introducing new changes, which would need to be
>copied over again, start decoupling the already existing duplicate
>functionality into a new module, which will be shared between several
>Intel Ethernet drivers. The first name that came to my mind was
>"libie" -- "Intel Ethernet common library". Also this sounds like
>"lovelie" (-> one word, no "lib I E" pls) and can be expanded as
>"lib Internet Explorer" :P
>The series is only the beginning. From now on, adding every new feature
>or doing any good driver refactoring will remove much more lines than add
>for quite some time. There's a basic roadmap with some deduplications
>planned already, not speaking of that touching every line now asks:
>"can I share this?". The final destination is very ambitious: have only
>one unified driver for at least i40e, ice, iavf, and idpf with a struct
>ops for each generation. That's never gonna happen, right? But you still
>can at least try.
>PP conversion for iavf lands within the same series as these two are tied
>closely. libie will support Page Pool model only, so that a driver can't
>use much of the lib until it's converted. iavf is only the example, the
>rest will eventually be converted soon on a per-driver basis. That is
>when it gets really interesting. Stay tech.

The world would not be the same without intel driver duplicates :/

Out of curiosity, what changed? I always thought this is
done for sake of easier out of tree driver development and old device
support dropping.