linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: arm: Avoid polling for scmi_perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZWSwQklU0MFQLMeI@bogus>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:05:38 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
        Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pmdomain: arm: Avoid polling for scmi_perf_domain

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> It was a mistake to prefer polling based mode when setting a performance
> level for a domain. Let's instead rely on the protocol to decide what is
> best and thus avoid polling when possible.
>
> Reported-by: Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>
> Fixes: 2af23ceb8624 ("pmdomain: arm: Add the SCMI performance domain")

Ah, I hadn't even noticed before  :). Anyways,

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep