linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:41:08 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for framer infrastructure and PEF2256
 framer

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:26:56PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:03 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > If this gets applied it'd be good to get a signed tag based off Linus'
> > tree so things that depend on it can be pulled into other trees (eg, the
> > ASoC mapping for the framer).

> Do you mean my pin control tree or the big penguins tree? :D
> (I'm guessing mine.)

I actually meant mainline there.

> I thought this thing would be merged primarily into the networking
> tree, and I don't know if they do signed tags, I usually create an
> immutable branch but that should work just as fine I guess.

Right, I'd expect a signed tag on the immutable branch - it's generally
helpful to avoid confusion about the branch actually being immutable.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)