[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231128151640.00007d8f@Huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:16:40 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
<jianyong.wu@....com>, <justin.he@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 15/22] x86/topology: Switch over to
GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES
On Tue, 07 Nov 2023 10:30:35 +0000
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>
> Now that GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES calls arch_register_cpu(), which can be
> overridden by the arch code, switch over to this to allow common code
> to choose when the register_cpu() call is made.
>
> x86's struct cpus come from struct x86_cpu, which has no other members
> or users. Remove this and use the version defined by common code.
>
> This is an intermediate step to the logic being moved to drivers/acpi,
> where GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES will do the work when booting with acpi=off.
>
> This patch also has the effect of moving the registration of CPUs from
> subsys to driver core initialisation, prior to any initcalls running.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
In perfect world, I'd have liked the structure squash done as a precursor
as then the patch would have been a little less noisy.
However, sometimes it's just not worth the effort.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists