[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170119374454.445690.515311393756577368.b4-ty@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 18:49:23 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/17] dt-bindings: samsung: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Merging
> =======
> I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
> 1. Next cycle two new SoCs will be coming (Google GS101 and ExynosAutov920), so
> they will touch the same lines in some of the DT bindings (not all, though).
> It is reasonable for me to take the bindings for the new SoCs, to have clean
> `make dtbs_check` on the new DTS.
> 2. Having it together helps me to have clean `make dtbs_check` within my tree
> on the existing DTS.
> 3. No drivers are affected by this change.
> 4. I plan to do the same for Tesla FSD and Exynos ARM32 SoCs, thus expect
> follow up patchsets.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[12/17] dt-bindings: pwm: samsung: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
commit: 5d67b8f81b9d598599366214e3b2eb5f84003c9f
Best regards,
--
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists