linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 02/10] bcache: avoid oversize memory allocation by small stripe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231128211001.877333-2-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 16:09:51 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
        Andrea Tomassetti <andrea.tomassetti-opensource@...o.com>,
        Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        kent.overstreet@...il.com, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 02/10] bcache: avoid oversize memory allocation by small stripe_size

From: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>

[ Upstream commit baf8fb7e0e5ec54ea0839f0c534f2cdcd79bea9c ]

Arraies bcache->stripe_sectors_dirty and bcache->full_dirty_stripes are
used for dirty data writeback, their sizes are decided by backing device
capacity and stripe size. Larger backing device capacity or smaller
stripe size make these two arraies occupies more dynamic memory space.

Currently bcache->stripe_size is directly inherited from
queue->limits.io_opt of underlying storage device. For normal hard
drives, its limits.io_opt is 0, and bcache sets the corresponding
stripe_size to 1TB (1<<31 sectors), it works fine 10+ years. But for
devices do declare value for queue->limits.io_opt, small stripe_size
(comparing to 1TB) becomes an issue for oversize memory allocations of
bcache->stripe_sectors_dirty and bcache->full_dirty_stripes, while the
capacity of hard drives gets much larger in recent decade.

For example a raid5 array assembled by three 20TB hardrives, the raid
device capacity is 40TB with typical 512KB limits.io_opt. After the math
calculation in bcache code, these two arraies will occupy 400MB dynamic
memory. Even worse Andrea Tomassetti reports that a 4KB limits.io_opt is
declared on a new 2TB hard drive, then these two arraies request 2GB and
512MB dynamic memory from kzalloc(). The result is that bcache device
always fails to initialize on his system.

To avoid the oversize memory allocation, bcache->stripe_size should not
directly inherited by queue->limits.io_opt from the underlying device.
This patch defines BCH_MIN_STRIPE_SZ (4MB) as minimal bcache stripe size
and set bcache device's stripe size against the declared limits.io_opt
value from the underlying storage device,
- If the declared limits.io_opt > BCH_MIN_STRIPE_SZ, bcache device will
  set its stripe size directly by this limits.io_opt value.
- If the declared limits.io_opt < BCH_MIN_STRIPE_SZ, bcache device will
  set its stripe size by a value multiplying limits.io_opt and euqal or
  large than BCH_MIN_STRIPE_SZ.

Then the minimal stripe size of a bcache device will always be >= 4MB.
For a 40TB raid5 device with 512KB limits.io_opt, memory occupied by
bcache->stripe_sectors_dirty and bcache->full_dirty_stripes will be 50MB
in total. For a 2TB hard drive with 4KB limits.io_opt, memory occupied
by these two arraies will be 2.5MB in total.

Such mount of memory allocated for bcache->stripe_sectors_dirty and
bcache->full_dirty_stripes is reasonable for most of storage devices.

Reported-by: Andrea Tomassetti <andrea.tomassetti-opensource@...o.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-2-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 1 +
 drivers/md/bcache/super.c  | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
index e81d783109847..d0311e3065caf 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ struct bcache_device {
 #define BCACHE_DEV_WB_RUNNING		3
 #define BCACHE_DEV_RATE_DW_RUNNING	4
 	int			nr_stripes;
+#define BCH_MIN_STRIPE_SZ		((4 << 20) >> SECTOR_SHIFT)
 	unsigned int		stripe_size;
 	atomic_t		*stripe_sectors_dirty;
 	unsigned long		*full_dirty_stripes;
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 4b076f7f184be..8b4a2bd6b57c9 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -807,6 +807,8 @@ static int bcache_device_init(struct bcache_device *d, unsigned int block_size,

 	if (!d->stripe_size)
 		d->stripe_size = 1 << 31;
+	else if (d->stripe_size < BCH_MIN_STRIPE_SZ)
+		d->stripe_size = roundup(BCH_MIN_STRIPE_SZ, d->stripe_size);

 	d->nr_stripes = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(sectors, d->stripe_size);

-- 
2.42.0