linux-kernel - Re: Linux 6.1.64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 21:18:37 +0000
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     François Valenduc <francoisvalenduc@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, lwn@....net,
        jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: Linux 6.1.64

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:11:32PM +0100, François Valenduc wrote:
> 
> Le 28/11/23 à 20:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit :
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 08:22:22PM +0100, François Valenduc wrote:
> > > Build fails on my baremetal server on scaleway:
> > > 
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:215:20: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘evmptr_is_valid’ with type ‘bool(u64)’ {aka ‘_Bool(long long unsigned
> > > int)’}
> > >    215 | static inline bool evmptr_is_valid(u64 evmptr)
> > >        |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:184:6: error: redeclaration of ‘enum
> > > nested_evmptrld_status’
> > >    184 | enum nested_evmptrld_status {
> > >        |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:220:6: note: originally defined here
> > >    220 | enum nested_evmptrld_status {
> > >        |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:185:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_DISABLED’
> > >    185 |         EVMPTRLD_DISABLED,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:221:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_DISABLED’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > >    221 |         EVMPTRLD_DISABLED,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:186:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED’
> > >    186 |         EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:222:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > >    222 |         EVMPTRLD_SUCCEEDED,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:187:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL’
> > >    187 |         EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:223:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > >    223 |         EVMPTRLD_VMFAIL,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:55:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/hyperv.h:188:9: error: redeclaration of enumerator
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_ERROR’
> > >    188 |         EVMPTRLD_ERROR,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > In file included from arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:54:
> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h:224:9: note: previous definition of
> > > ‘EVMPTRLD_ERROR’ with type ‘enum nested_evmptrld_status’
> > >    224 |         EVMPTRLD_ERROR,
> > >        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.o] Error 1
> > > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/x86/kvm] Error 2
> > > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:500: arch/x86] Error 2
> > > 
> > > The configuration file is attached. Kernel 6.1.62 compiled fine.
> > > Does somebody have an idea about this ?
> > I just tried your .config file here and it builds just fine for 6.1.64,
> > what version of gcc are you using that causes failures?  I tried gcc-12
> > successfully.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> Bisection gave very strange results until I found the tree was corrupted. I
> recreated it correctly and it works fine.
> Sorry for the noise.

No worries, thanks for reporting it, glad it is resolved.

greg k-h