lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 05:18:57 +0000
From:   "Song, Xiongwei" <Xiongwei.Song@...driver.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "sxwjean@...com" <sxwjean@...com>,
        "42.hyeyoo@...il.com" <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
CC:     "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
        "penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
        "rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        "iamjoonsoo.kim@....com" <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "roman.gushchin@...ux.dev" <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove
 slab_max_order and noaliencache



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2023 8:03 PM
> To: Song, Xiongwei <Xiongwei.Song@...driver.com>; sxwjean@...com;
> 42.hyeyoo@...il.com; linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: cl@...ux.com; penberg@...nel.org; rientjes@...gle.com; iamjoonsoo.kim@....com;
> akpm@...ux-foundation.org; roman.gushchin@...ux.dev; corbet@....net; linux-
> doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove slab_max_order and
> noaliencache
> 
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
> is safe.
> 
> On 11/26/23 08:25, Song, Xiongwei wrote:
> > Hi Vlastimil,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> >> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 7:24 PM
> >> To: sxwjean@...com; 42.hyeyoo@...il.com; linux-mm@...ck.org
> >> Cc: cl@...ux.com; penberg@...nel.org; rientjes@...gle.com; iamjoonsoo.kim@....com;
> >> akpm@...ux-foundation.org; roman.gushchin@...ux.dev; corbet@....net; linux-
> >> doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Song, Xiongwei
> >> <Xiongwei.Song@...driver.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kernel-parameters: remove slab_max_order and
> >> noaliencache
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/22/23 15:36, sxwjean@...com wrote:
> >> > From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>
> >> >
> >> > Since slab allocator has already been removed. There is no users about
> >> > slab_max_order and noaliencache, so let's remove them.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@...driver.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > v2: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com> suggested that noaliencache should be
> >> > removed too. Here adding this change. The patch is based on [1].
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/linux.git/log/?h=slab-
> remove-
> >> slab-v2r1
> >> >
> >> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231120091214.150502-1-
> >> sxwjean@...com/T/#m55ebb45851bc86d650baf65dfe8296d33c5b1126
> >> > ---
> >> >  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 10 ----------
> >> >  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> b/Documentation/admin-
> >> guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> > index 65731b060e3f..d56a5beefe24 100644
> >> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> > @@ -3740,10 +3740,6 @@
> >> >       no5lvl          [X86-64,RISCV] Disable 5-level paging mode. Forces
> >> >                       kernel to use 4-level paging instead.
> >> >
> >> > -     noaliencache    [MM, NUMA, SLAB] Disables the allocation of alien
> >> > -                     caches in the slab allocator.  Saves per-node memory,
> >> > -                     but will impact performance.
> >>
> >> No question about this one, can be deleted.
> >>
> >> > -
> >> >       noalign         [KNL,ARM]
> >> >
> >> >       noaltinstr      [S390] Disables alternative instructions patching
> >> > @@ -5887,12 +5883,6 @@
> >> >                       own.
> >> >                       For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >> >
> >> > -     slab_max_order= [MM, SLAB]
> >> > -                     Determines the maximum allowed order for slabs.
> >> > -                     A high setting may cause OOMs due to memory
> >> > -                     fragmentation.  Defaults to 1 for systems with
> >> > -                     more than 32MB of RAM, 0 otherwise.
> >>
> >> I think here we should consider the long-term plan first. It's a bit
> >> unfortunate (in hindsight) SLUB brought its own prefix of parameters, even
> >> if some became interchangeable aliases later (slab/slub_nomerge), some not.
> >> I think it would be best to unify them, and consider the string "slub" an
> >> implementation detail of the general "slab allocator" term going forward.
> >>
> >> So what I'd propose is that we change all parameters to accept a
> >> "slab_$param" as a primary and documented name (and the description can
> >> contain just [MM] tag, no [SLAB] or [SLUB] needed), with "slub_$param" is
> >> also accepted as an alias where it exists today, and there's just a note
> >> that the slub_$param name is also accepted in the description of the
> >> canonical parameter, not in a separate description. Then maybe in a few
> >> years we can mark the old names as deprecated and start issuing low-key
> >> warnings (while still accepting them), and in 10 years maybe remove them
> >> completely. Thoughts?
> >
> > Sorry, I didn't know the SLUB history, thanks for the comments and proposal.
> >
> > Did you mean the rough diff below?
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-
> guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index 65731b060e3f..db6d2ebe7c7d 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -5871,10 +5871,12 @@
> >          slram=          [HW,MTD]
> >
> >          slab_merge      [MM]
> > +       slub_merge      [MM]
> >                          Enable merging of slabs with similar size when the
> >                          kernel is built without CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT.
> 
> I'd hope the result look more like this, so the duplicate names are not
> so prominent.
> 
>         slab_merge      [MM]
>                         Enable merging of slabs with similar size when the
>                         kernel is built without CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT.
>                         (slub_merge also accepted as an alias)
> 
> Note that it's not just a Documentation change anymore, as many of the
> parameters don't have the slab_ variants yet wired up.

Ok, thanks. Will create a patch for it.

Regards,
Xiongwei

> 
> >
> >          slab_nomerge    [MM]
> > +       slub_nomerge    [MM]
> >                          Disable merging of slabs with similar size. May be
> >                          necessary if there is some reason to distinguish
> >                          allocs to different slabs, especially in hardened
> > @@ -5887,12 +5889,6 @@
> >                          own.
> >                          For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slab_max_order= [MM, SLAB]
> > -                       Determines the maximum allowed order for slabs.
> > -                       A high setting may cause OOMs due to memory
> > -                       fragmentation.  Defaults to 1 for systems with
> > -                       more than 32MB of RAM, 0 otherwise.
> > -
> >          slub_debug[=options[,slabs][;[options[,slabs]]...]      [MM, SLUB]
> >                          Enabling slub_debug allows one to determine the
> >                          culprit if slab objects become corrupted. Enabling
> > @@ -5901,13 +5897,15 @@
> >                          last alloc / free. For more information see
> >                          Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_max_order= [MM, SLUB]
> > +       slab_max_order= [MM]
> > +       slub_max_order= [MM]
> >                          Determines the maximum allowed order for slabs.
> >                          A high setting may cause OOMs due to memory
> >                          fragmentation. For more information see
> >                          Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_min_objects=       [MM, SLUB]
> > +       slab_min_objects=       [MM]
> > +       slub_min_objects=       [MM]
> >                          The minimum number of objects per slab. SLUB will
> >                          increase the slab order up to slub_max_order to
> >                          generate a sufficiently large slab able to contain
> > @@ -5916,18 +5914,12 @@
> >                          and the less frequently locks need to be acquired.
> >                          For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_min_order= [MM, SLUB]
> > +       slub_min_order= [MM]
> > +       slab_min_order= [MM]
> >                          Determines the minimum page order for slabs.
> > Must be
> >                          lower than slub_max_order.
> >                          For more information see Documentation/mm/slub.rst.
> >
> > -       slub_merge      [MM, SLUB]
> > -                       Same with slab_merge.
> > -
> > -       slub_nomerge    [MM, SLUB]
> > -                       Same with slab_nomerge. This is supported for
> > legacy.
> > -                       See slab_nomerge for more information.
> > -
> >          smart2=         [HW]
> >                          Format: <io1>[,<io2>[,...,<io8>]]
> >
> > If so I think we should use slab_&param in mm/slub.c. When hitting "slub_$param"
> > we need to assign the value to "slab_&param" like "slab_nomerge", right?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Xiongwei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ