linux-kernel - Re: dtbs_check: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/pressure/honeywell,mprls0025pa.yaml: properties:honeywell,pmin-pascal: '$ref' should not be valid under {'const': '$ref'}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dae38777-0ac3-4881-a566-a0a8fce5e6ed@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 28 Nov 2023 08:24:27 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Andreas Klinger <ak@...klinger.de>
Cc:     oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dtbs_check:
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/pressure/honeywell,mprls0025pa.yaml:
 properties:honeywell,pmin-pascal: '$ref' should not be valid under {'const':
 '$ref'}

On 28/11/2023 01:19, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head:   2cc14f52aeb78ce3f29677c2de1f06c0e91471ab
> commit: a765c985e69671054f397046b1d94d8c6e34149e dt-bindings: iio: pressure: Support Honeywell mprls0025pa sensor
> date:   6 months ago
> compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231128/202311280502.L6YVZhv5-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311280502.L6YVZhv5-lkp@intel.com/
> 

Entire report looks like result of running newer dtschema on old commit.
That's not good approach, because we add new checks to dtschema, so such
failures are expected (for 6 month old commit!). LKP should probably not
test old commits with dtschema.

Best regards,
Krzysztof