[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fd55b36-0837-4bf7-9fde-e573d6cb214a@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 08:29:30 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>
Cc: tomasz.figa@...il.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, semen.protsenko@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: samsung: add irq_set_affinity() for non wake
up external gpio interrupt
On 28/11/2023 02:01, Youngmin Nam wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 10:54:56AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 26/11/2023 10:46, Youngmin Nam wrote:
>>> To support affinity setting for non wake up external gpio interrupt,
>>> add irq_set_affinity callback using irq number from pinctrl driver data.
>>>
>>> Before this patch, changing the irq affinity of gpio interrupt is not possible:
>>>
>>> # cat /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity
>>> 3ff
>>> # echo 00f > /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity
>>
>> Does this command succeed on your board?
>>
> Yes.
Hm, fails all the time one mine.
>
>>> # cat /proc/irq/418/smp_affinity
>>> 3ff
>>> # cat /proc/interrupts
>>> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 ...
>>> 418: 3631 0 0 0 ...
>>>
>>> With this patch applied, it's possible to change irq affinity of gpio interrupt:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> On which board did you test it?
>>
>>
> I tested on S5E9945 ERD(Exynos Reference Development) board.
There is no such board upstream. How can we reproduce this issue? I am
afraid we cannot test neither the bug nor the fix.
>
>>> + if (parent)
>>> + return parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, dest, force);
>>> +
>>
>> I think there is a helper for it: irq_chip_set_affinity_parent().
>>
>>
>
> The irq_chip_set_affinity_parent() requires parent_data of irq_data.
Hm, so now I wonder why do we not have parent_data...
> But when I tested as below, exynos's irqd->parent_data was null.
> So we should use irqchip's affinity function instead of the helper function.
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists