[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO7dBbVJ=ytRra_77VRZ8ud1wVkP9fub=Vj6cfTkx=CnYg5J2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:12:28 +0800
From: Tao Liu <ltao@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>, Pingfan Liu <piliu@...hat.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] kdump: crashkernel reservation from CMA
Hi Jiri,
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 5:22 AM Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi Tao,
>
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 09:51:54AM +0800, Tao Liu wrote:
> > Thanks for the idea of using CMA as part of memory for the 2nd kernel.
> > However I have a question:
> >
> > What if there is on-going DMA/RDMA access on the CMA range when 1st
> > kernel crash? There might be data corruption when 2nd kernel and
> > DMA/RDMA write to the same place, how to address such an issue?
>
> The crash kernel CMA area(s) registered via
> cma_declare_contiguous() are distinct from the
> dma_contiguous_default_area or device-specific CMA areas that
> dma_alloc_contiguous() would use to reserve memory for DMA.
>
> Kernel pages will not be allocated from the crash kernel CMA
> area(s), because they are not GFP_MOVABLE. The CMA area will only
> be used for user pages.
>
> User pages for RDMA, should be pinned with FOLL_LONGTERM and that
> would migrate them away from the CMA area.
>
> But you're right that DMA to user pages pinned without
> FOLL_LONGTERM would still be possible. Would this be a problem in
> practice? Do you see any way around it?
>
Thanks for the explanation! Sorry I don't have any ideas so far...
@Pingfan Liu @Baoquan He Hi, do you have any suggestions for it?
Thanks,
Tao Liu
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> SUSE Labs, Prague, Czechia
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists