[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <832a6d4f-f561-4cf5-b1cb-7e4b2d4d50b4@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 09:51:50 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <varada@...varada-blr.qualcomm.com>,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, quic_varada@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Fix USB
'vdda-pll-supply'
On 28/11/2023 09:46, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> From: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
>
> The earlier patch ec4f047679d5, incorrectly used 'l2'
> as the vdda-pll-supply. However, 'l5' is the correct
> ldo that supplies power to the USB PHY.
>
> Fixes: ec4f047679d5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Enable USB")
Doesn't this depend on the driver change? It affects both existing
kernel and backports which you claim here should happen.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists