[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW_6rU3uVuBBKh2nMWPC0tPOpxhf9xhD2L6T5frsF=q3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 11:04:30 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Andrzej Kacprowski <andrzej.kacprowski@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacek Lawrynowicz <jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:29 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3f7c0634926d ("accel/ivpu/37xx: Fix hangs related to MMIO reset")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commits:
>
> 3de6d9597892 ("accel/ivpu: Pass D0i3 residency time to the VPU firmware")
> cc19fedab8bd ("accel/ivpu/37xx: Print warning when VPUIP is not idle during power down")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks for your resolution!
> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
> @@@ -720,14 -731,19 +733,14 @@@ static int ivpu_hw_37xx_power_down(stru
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev))
> - ivpu_warn(vdev, "VPU not idle during power down\n");
> + ivpu_hw_37xx_save_d0i3_entry_timestamp(vdev);
>
> - if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev)) {
> - ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to reset VPU\n");
> - ret = -EIO;
> + if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev)) {
> + ivpu_warn(vdev, "VPU not idle during power down\n");
> + if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev))
> + ivpu_warn(vdev, "Failed to reset the VPU\n");
> }
>
> - if (ivpu_pll_disable(vdev)) {
> - ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to disable PLL\n");
> - ret = -EIO;
> - }
> -
> if (ivpu_hw_37xx_d0i3_enable(vdev)) {
> ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to enter D0I3\n");
> ret = -EIO;
I've just run into the same conflict, and I think you lost the split
into two if-statements in the last hunk of commit 3f7c0634926d
("accel/ivpu/37xx: Fix hangs related to MMIO reset")?
My resolution is:
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_hw_37xx.c
@@@ -720,11 -731,16 +733,13 @@@ static int ivpu_hw_37xx_power_down(stru
{
int ret = 0;
+ ivpu_hw_37xx_save_d0i3_entry_timestamp(vdev);
+
- if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev)) {
+ if (!ivpu_hw_37xx_is_idle(vdev))
ivpu_warn(vdev, "VPU not idle during power down\n");
- if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev))
- ivpu_warn(vdev, "Failed to reset the VPU\n");
- }
- if (ivpu_pll_disable(vdev)) {
- ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to disable PLL\n");
+ if (ivpu_hw_37xx_reset(vdev)) {
+ ivpu_err(vdev, "Failed to reset VPU\n");
ret = -EIO;
}
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists